The best cameras of 2020
08.04.2020 16 986 22

The best cameras of 2020

Enough and 1 minute of active dialogue with the photographer, so that there would be no thought that in the near future smartphones would supposedly supersede the popularity of professional cameras. Be that as it may, this segment of technology is relevant, and in the near future no other trend is expected. This is confirmed by our rating of the best cameras in 2020, in which you will find simple, premium digital and SLR cameras.

Friends, it’s worth saying right away that our list contains not only flagship models, but also popular cameras in terms of price and quality. If, for any reason, you are unable to find a suitable option, we recommend that you pay attention to the DxOMark service, one of the most authoritative resources involved in testing cameras. Do not forget about the key selection parameters and characteristics, some of which are presented at the end of the article.

Rating of the best cameras in 2020

Category A place Name Price
The best low-cost cameras5Sony W8308 500 ₽
4Fujifilm FinePix XP14012 500 ₽
3Canon PowerShot SX620 HS15 990 ₽
2Sony RX10021 000 ₽
1Panasonic DMC-TZ8021 990 ₽
The best digital cameras5Sony HX40029 000 ₽
4Canon PowerShot SX70 HS41 000 ₽
3Panasonic DMC-FZ100056 000 ₽
2Nikon Coolpix P90041 000 ₽
1Sony RX10 IV45 000 ₽
The best SLR cameras5Canon EOS 90D85 000 ₽
4Nikon D780145 000 ₽
3Sony A77 II45 000 ₽
2Nikon D850175 000 ₽
1Canon EOS 1D X Mark II body 320 000 ₽

The best low-cost cameras

In this category, simple varieties of digital cameras are presented, differing primarily in compact sizes. Accordingly, small matrices are installed in them. Another feature of digital compact cameras is a non-removable lens, as well as a low level of optical zoom. It is worth saying that such gadgets are often equipped with an extensive set of functions, and this greatly simplifies the process of setting up technology. Therefore, for inexperienced users, this option is more cost-effective. In fairness, it is worth saying that in the premium class there are very advanced compact models.

5

Sony W830

8 500 ₽
Sony W830

The Top 15 cameras are opened by the budget model Sony W830, equipped with a rather large 20.1-megapixel matrix with 8x optical zoom. In addition, the camera has a very fast autofocus and good stabilization Optical SteadyShot. Agree, pretty good options, given that the gadget fits in a regular pocket. This model uses a ZEISS lens. You can shoot crystal clear video in 720p HD format, and instantly play it on any device. Pleased with the presence of an automatic intelligent mode Intelligent Auto, which is responsible for the automatic adjustment of camera settings. No complicated manual settings are required! Support for Beauty Effects at the same time indicates an extremely simple editing of the pictures taken.

+pros
  • compact sizes;
  • appearance;
  • ZEISS lens
  • case quality.
-Minuses
  • step zoom.
4

Fujifilm FinePix XP140

12 500 ₽
Fujifilm FinePix XP140

If you do not support the idea that modern smartphones have replaced good compact cameras, you should pay attention to the Fujifilm FinePix XP140 model. In this class of devices, this is definitely a top-end option that attracts with simple setup, low price and good shooting quality. The model has a really large zoom and a high degree of mechanical protection. As for the shooting parameters, the indicators are almost identical to the legendary FinePix XP130. At the same time, the new protected camera is not afraid of immersion in water up to 25 meters. Has a high ISO sensitivity of 12,800 and many new shooting modes. Now it is possible to shoot 4K video at a speed of 15 frames per second. Full HD video at speeds up to 60 frames per second.

+pros
  • small sizes;
  • protected case;
  • good sensitivity;
  • 4K video schema.
-Minuses
  • not the best lens.
3

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

15 990 ₽
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

A compact but very good camera is offered by a well-known equipment manufacturer; Canon is the PowerShot SX620 HS. A simple and at the same time high-quality portable camera pleases with 25x zoom, which provides support for Wi-Fi, the NFC module, as well as all the necessary options for comfortable creating high-quality photos and videos, followed by sending data to smartphones. Special attention should be paid to a proprietary application called Camera Connect, as well as an option for remote control of shooting. Images and videos can be stored on cloud services, including Canon's Irista.

+pros
  • NFC module
  • ease of use;
  • affordable cost;
  • proprietary application.
-Minuses
  • autofocus quality.
2

Sony RX100

21 000 ₽
Sony RX100

If you don’t know which budget camera to buy, we recommend paying attention to the Sony RX100 model with an advanced F1.8 ZEISS Vario-Sonnar T lens and a wide aperture. The camera is based on the advanced Exmor ™ CMOS sensor with 20.2 megapixels. Judging by the comments, the matrix captures even more light compared to its predecessor. In addition, a powerful BIONZ processor is used to quickly process high-quality images. It is worth adding that users have the opportunity to independently set the ISO level in the region from 125 to 6400. The camera attracts with a unique design, thoughtful design of light aluminum. Free software is supplied with the device.

+pros
  • good screen;
  • compact sizes;
  • video 1080p50;
  • detailing.
-Minuses
  • Incorrect ABB.
1

Panasonic DMC-TZ80

21 990 ₽
Panasonic DMC-TZ80

The best low-cost camera of 2020 is the Panasonic DMC-TZ80, which has many nice options for travelers. The device supports 4K resolution. Inside is an advanced highly sensitive MOS sensor and a powerful Venus Engine processor, used in top-end cameras of the LUMIX class. The matrix has a resolution of 18.1 megapixels. Based on customer comments, it guarantees excellent quality in RAW format even in poor lighting conditions. Each image contains data on color and light. You can edit the photo in the first step right on the device.

+pros
  • modern matrix;
  • good processor;
  • compact sizes;
  • support for 4K video.
-Minuses
  • not found.

The best digital cameras

This category presents good digital models in terms of value for money. Cameras with non-removable optics can give a magnification of magnification, up to 40x, and sometimes even higher. As for the functionality, much depends on the final cost and producer price policy. So, therefore, two models with approximately equal cost can guarantee a completely different level of ease of use and scope. We tried to present the most advanced devices with an adequate cost. Due to the abundance of functions of the models described below, they are also called “pseudo-mirrors”, but you should understand that even expensive premium solutions of this class are still inferior to MILC cameras and “DSLRs”.

5

Sony HX400

29 000 ₽
Sony HX400

The Sony HX400 model replenishes the rating of digital cameras, with its capabilities not inferior to mirror models in several key parameters. The features of the premium device include a 50x optical zoom and a very sensitive Exmor R CMOS sensor with a resolution of 20.4 megapixels. Gorgeous clarity is achieved both when shooting scenes from close and long distances. Special attention is deserved by the high-quality lens of the Vario-Sonnar T * ZEISS series, which is distinguished by a professional level of image processing, smooth autofocus and good aperture ratios. High performance is guaranteed by the BIONZ X image processor, which is up to three times faster than its predecessor.

+pros
  • 50x optical zoom;
  • Optical SteadyShot stabilizer;
  • Exmor R CMOS matrix;
  • great lens.
-Minuses
  • small battery.
4

Canon PowerShot SX70 HS

41 000 ₽
Canon PowerShot SX70 HS

Another semi-professional camera from Canon, equipped with the latest digital technology.The PowerShot SX70 HS has a 65x zoom, as well as support for the most popular formats, including RAW and 4K. In addition, it supports Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. Even more opportunities in terms of remote shooting guarantee technology Live View. Attracted by ergonomic design, as well as focusing at a great distance. Judging by the comments of users, you can take macro pictures without any experience. At the same time, the device is characterized by a long service life and stable operation even under difficult conditions.

+pros
  • 65x zoom
  • shooting 4K video;
  • touch control;
  • effective stabilization.
-Minuses
  • massive lens.
3

Panasonic DMC-FZ1000

56 000 ₽
Panasonic DMC-FZ1000

If you are looking for a top-end compact camera, you should pay attention to the Panasonic DMC-FZ1000 model, made with an emphasis on video recording. Ergonomic design weighs only 830 grams in the presence of very solid iron. The structure of the design includes advanced hardware, including a CMOS-matrix, the size of which is 13.2 by 8.8 millimeters. The maximum frame size in this case can reach 5472x3648 pixels. It is worth noting that the camera is capable of shooting 4K video at a frequency of 30 frames per second. The advantages of the device include a bright external flash, a good tripod and a wear-resistant 3-inch swivel screen.

+pros
  • resolution 5760x2880;
  • compact sizes;
  • great focus.
-Minuses
  • big lens.
2

Nikon Coolpix P900

41 000 ₽
Nikon Coolpix P900

It's hard to find a more suitable digital camera for wildlife photography than the Nikon Coolpix P900. The model received a new 16-megapixel matrix with a very powerful 83x zoom. With the help of such a sensor it will be possible to capture even small details. At the same time, it became possible to shoot with a shutter speed 5.0 steps slower due to the system of optical vibration reduction based on Dual Detect Optical VR technology. There is a built-in electronic viewfinder, opening up great opportunities for composing frames. In addition, there is an extensive set of built-in modules, including GPS, GLONASS, as well as QZSS. In turn, Dynamic Fine Zoom technology extends the basic zoom up to 166x with focal length coverage of up to 2000 millimeters.

+pros
  • Dual Detect Optical VR;
  • smart zoom;
  • good sharpness;
  • overall picture quality.
-Minuses
  • not found.
1

Sony RX10 IV

45 000 ₽
Sony RX10 IV

The best camera of 2020 in terms of price and quality is the legendary Sony RX10 model, which has a fairly advanced 1-inch matrix with a resolution of 20.2 megapixels. The focal length varies from 24 to 200 millimeters. The aperture ratio of the lens is f / 2.8. At the same time, the original device, combining advanced optics and a “mirror” format matrix, is distinguished by its affordable price today. But this is not the point. A key feature is a full-time lens that combines a wide range of focal lengths. The sensitivity of the matrix in this case can reach 25600 iso. Also pleased with the good 3-inch swivel screen, complemented by an advanced electronic viewfinder.

+pros
  • advanced matrix;
  • good lens;
  • original design;
  • great screen.
-Minuses
  • not detected.

The best SLR cameras

Despite certain discussions, we are talking about the technically most advanced class of digital cameras. They got their name due to the presence of a complex system of mirrors that are located in the camera body. With their help, light enters the viewfinder through the lens, so that the user can see exactly what they will be shot. The matrix of the camera is completely hidden from light, the rays fall on it exclusively at the time of shooting. Therefore, you do not have to worry about overheating and possible noise in the picture. As a rule, such lenses in the DSLRs are interchangeable.

5

Canon EOS 90D

85 000 ₽
Canon EOS 90D

This is an advanced SLR camera with a Canon EF / EF-S mount. The manufacturer himself positions this tool as an ideal solution for shooting sports competitions. However, many enthusiasts managed to use this device to create high-quality images of devices and other objects.A good result is due to the use of the premium DIGIC 8 processor, as well as the 32-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor, whose resolution reaches 6960 by 4640 pixels. The physical dimensions of the sensor are 22.3 x 14.8 millimeters. It is worth adding that this model supports serial shooting. Implemented support for 4K video and wireless communications, including Wi-Fi, NFC, as well as Bluetooth.

+pros
  • AF in 4K mode;
  • battery life;
  • ergonomic model;
  • not a bad matrix.
-Minuses
  • memory buffer.
4

Nikon D780

145 000 ₽
Nikon D780

The Nikon D780 is a full-frame DSLR DSLR studio camera. At the same time, a full-frame instrument is significantly cheaper than the D850. Good quality photo guarantees a large matrix, the size of which is 36 by 24 millimeters. At the same time, the 24.5-megapixel BSI-CMOS matrix is ​​complemented by smart phase sensors of automatic focus, which greatly simplifies the process of operating the equipment by inexperienced users. It is worth adding that the tool works on the basis of a powerful EXPEED 6 processor, which many have already met in Nikon Z 6 and version Z 7. At the same time, the manufacturer speaks about the improved capabilities of the new product in limited lighting conditions, which is justified by the high sensitivity of the camera.

+pros
  • excellent matrix;
  • powerful processor;
  • sensitive matrix;
  • phase sensors.
-Minuses
  • not a new model.
3

Sony A77 II

45 000 ₽
Sony A77 II

Another good SLR camera, which received a professional Exmor CMOS APS-C sensor, whose size is 23.5 × 15.6 millimeters. The resolution of the sensor is 24.3 megapixels. In addition, it has a good primary filter and a BIONZ X graphic chip. It is worth adding that this camera uses an autofocus system, supplemented by 79 sensors, including 15 cross ones. Together with the F2.8 aperture, a chic result is achieved. At the same time, the new algorithm guarantees high accuracy as well as performance. Special attention should be paid to the 0.5-inch screen made by OLED technology.

+pros
  • good screen;
  • chic autofocus;
  • compact sizes;
  • light filter.
-Minuses
  • quickly snapping up.
2

Nikon D850

175 000 ₽
Nikon D850

The ex-leader in the professional SLR camera segment is the Nikon D850, the only drawback of which is its high price compared to the 750 series. Nevertheless, the Japanese manufacturer was able to significantly improve the functionality of the model. At the same time, a powerful 45-megapixel matrix with physical dimensions of 35.9 by 23.9 millimeters was able to fit in a 915 gram case. The maximum resolution is 8256x5504 pixels. Given the size, it is clear that storing images will require a lot of memory. Fortunately, the manufacturer took care of this circumstance by equipping the case with the Nikon F mount with two slots at once.

+pros
  • maximum resolution;
  • small case;
  • two slots for memory;
  • gorgeous matrix.
-Minuses
  • high price.
1

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II body

320 000 ₽
Canon EOS 1D X Mark II body

The best SLR camera of 2020 is the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II body with advanced performance, according to the manufacturer. Actually, customer reviews confirm this moment. A professional instrument, in essence, is the quintessence of two predecessors, including a reporting 1D Mark IV and a 1Ds Mark III studio camera. At the heart of the camera is the studio CMOS matrix, whose size is 36 by 24 millimeters. The resolution of the matrix is ​​equal to 18 megapixels with a maximum frame resolution of 5184x3456 pixels. It is worth saying that such powerful parameters did not greatly affect the ergonomics of the case - the design weighs a little more than 1.3 kilograms. Special attention should be paid to the ultrasonic sensor cleaning system, compatible with all Canon EF class lenses.

+pros
  • large matrix;
  • studio quality;
  • construction quality;
  • ultrasonic cleaning.
-Minuses
  • no.

How to choose a good camera?

It is worth saying right away that the purchase of such equipment, even for experienced users, is a daunting task.You can reveal more than 50 characteristics, but this is unlikely for someone to understand how to choose a camera for themselves and their needs. Therefore, friends, without professional advice, it will be difficult to manage. We, in turn, can only share our own opinion, present an assortment of popular models and highlight a number of important parameters:

  1. Matrix type. Currently, there are models with CCD sensors (CCD), CMOS (CMOS) and LiveMOS. The first matrices have pretty good characteristics, but cost more than CMOS. And this despite the fact that they are not suitable when working with point light sources in the frame. The second matrixes are considered the most popular, they are distinguished by an affordable price, they guarantee a chic focus. The only significant drawback is the likelihood of noise at high ISO. LiveMOS matrices are based on the principle of metal oxide semiconductors, they have a simplified design and a lower tendency to overheat.
  2. Matrix size. The physical size of the photosensitive element is calculated diagonally. In this case, not the usual value (2.54 centimeters) is used, but the Vidicon one, which implies 2.37 cm. But be that as it may, in modern models of compact sizes it is considered the norm 1 / 2.3 "or 1 / 1.8". For advanced models with interchangeable optics, the norm is considered in the region of 22.3x14.8 mm.
  3. Image size. We are talking about the dimensions of photographs taken in the normal mode. Not in the panoramic, mind you! This parameter depends on the size of the matrix. In theory, the larger the photo, the more details, but this is not always the case ...
  4. Photosensitivity. This parameter is specified in ISO. A high indicator is extremely important if a lens with a poor aperture ratio is used. It is important to consider that with an increase in ISO, the noise level also increases.
  5. Aperture. In simple words, this parameter is responsible for the ability of the lens to transmit light. It is generally accepted that the transmission characteristics are affected by the diameter of the hole and the focal length. In this case, the descriptions of modern models indicate the range of minimum and maximum focal lengths. It looks something like f / 2.8–4.5.

Optical zoom

We are talking about the magnification provided by the device using the characteristics of the lens. It is important to understand that this parameter applies exclusively to the image that the lens gives out at minimum magnification, and not relative to the picture visible to the naked eye. In other words, if 3x is indicated, then at maximum magnification, the objects in the frame will look three times larger than at minimum.

It is worth adding that the level of optical zoom is closely related to the focal length. At present, optical zoom, according to experts, gives the best quality of close-up objects, and are the preferred option against a digital background.

Digital zoom

This parameter is responsible for the magnification that the camera provides with software, not including the optics. In fact, we are talking about an increase, the essence of which is to stretch the visible image with a small portion of the matrix over the entire frame. The digital zoom does not depend on the capabilities of the lens, therefore, it does not affect the design. Cost, respectively, is more profitable. However, this is not enough for studio cameras. Cameras with exclusively digital zoom are used in cases where it is not possible to use an alternative option. That is, in compact models.

Manual focus

This feature provides the user with unnecessary actions against the background of manual focus, but opens up wider possibilities in terms of choosing the sharpness for the subject. You do not have to rely on autofocus, which is especially important if it is poorly implemented. Undoubtedly, for professionals this option is indispensable, but for novice users a moot point. However, if you plan to develop in this type of creativity, then you should pay attention to this option. On the one hand, the risk is likely that the first time the shots will be worse, but this will give the necessary experience so that in the future you can take studio photos.In devices with interchangeable optics, the type of focus always depends on the characteristics of the lens. As a rule, cameras with interchangeable lenses always support manual focus.

Which camera is best to buy in 2020?

Unfortunately, we did not consider a tenth of the parameters that should be taken into account if you do not know which camera to buy. Yes, you could still talk about bracketing, lens varieties and more. It is important to understand that it is necessary to select a camera, having a certain experience. And do not forget about the golden rule - in the hands of a professional, even a third-rate camera can become an uncompromising tool. Otherwise, similarly. In the end, summarize:

  • good budget camera - Panasonic DMC-TZ80;
  • best mirror model - Canon EOS 1D X;
  • digital camera for price and quality - Sony RX10 IV.

Techno Rating » Electronics »The best cameras of 2020
Similar news
The best coolers for the 2020 processor The best coolers for the 2020 processor
In an era of dynamic development of gaming systems, few enthusiasts are capable of
The best action cameras of 2020 The best action cameras of 2020
In the classic sense, action cameras do not apply to panoramic and 360 ° cameras,
The best epilators of 2020 The best epilators of 2020
With the development of laser hair removal, the demand for epilators gradually decreases. More
The best 4K TVs of 2020 The best 4K TVs of 2020
5-7 years ago, it was difficult to believe that the dominance of Full HD will supplant
Best cameras of 2019 Best cameras of 2019
As practice shows, even professional photographers face a number of
The best cameras of 2018 The best cameras of 2018
The best cameras of 2018 can be divided into SLR and digital
Comments (22)
To comment
  1. Anna
    #17 Anna Guests
    I was looking for a good inexpensive camera, I came across this article. I bought a Canon PowerShot SX70 HS, I really like the quality of the shooting. The only minus is a too massive lens, but this is insignificant, so feel free to take this camera, you will not regret it.
  2. Aleksandr Sviridov
    #16 Aleksandr Sviridov Guests
    The rating is dull, you send readers to the DXOMark resource, an excellent resource, but what prevented you from using it and not reinventing the wheel? At DXOMark, digital cameras are divided into six categories that rank them quite successfully, while you have mixed horses and people in a heap. Why did you single out “soap dishes” with a hyperzoom into a separate category? This is a very specific niche and, due to their design features, in principle, they cannot boast of image quality, and you call hypersum the best digital camera in terms of price / quality ratio. Gentlemen, learn to use e-katalog, Sony RX10IV on average costs 120,000 rubles. and not 45,000 as you write, and for the money, she will lose as any mirrorless. Mirrorless mirrors in general have been ruthlessly thrown out of the rating by you, and this is one of the most promising and rapidly developing areas.
    Separate words, and only obscene, deserves a description of the devices:
    Panasonic DMC-FZ1000 "The advantages of the device include a bright external flash, a good tripod and a wear-resistant 3-inch rotary screen." Unlike you, I was not too lazy and downloaded the instructions. Can Panasonic really equip its camera with an external flash and a tripod? Unfortunately no, everything is like everyone else. And this, unfortunately, is not the only cant, and the pros and cons of the devices are generally sucked from the finger.
    Well, we got to the recommendations on choosing a camera.
    Number 2. The size of the matrix. "In this case, not the usual value (2.54 centimeters) is used, but the Vidicon, which implies 2.37 cm." Firstly, 1.6 cm, secondly, read again the dregs you wrote and tell me, will a normal person understand what is written?
    Number 3. The size of the picture. “We are talking about the dimensions of photographs taken in the normal mode.” It’s interesting, do the photographs have side lights, and if the photograph is not dimensional (panoramic), do you need to hang red flags around its edges to indicate the dimensions? "This parameter depends on the size of the matrix." True from size? Just many people think that the number of pixels.
    In general, you can find fault with a lot and with pleasure, but is it really so difficult to find a person who understands photography a little better than the average layman and give him enough time to prepare a high-quality rating?
  3. Sergei
    #15 Sergei Guests
    There was a time when I didn’t even hear about Canon as a serious SLR. Grew up on Nikon (s). In my opinion, this is not the coolest Nikon (a). Although not a photographer for me, this is a name from childhood. I have a simple Nikon DSLR. So I will stay with Nikon (nom) until the end. I don’t want it to be like in the song “why then I lose more without having anything in return”.
  4. Vlad
    #14 Vlad Guests
    The photographer himself and the video operator with not much experience (1.5 years). Now the Nikon D5300 camera. Pretty simple, so to speak, for the entry level. At the moment I am choosing a new technique. Sympathetic to the Sony A77 II. In particular, the camera is necessary for shooting video, auto focus is especially useful. There are 79 sensors in this model, which is much more than in my current camera. I think soon I will get it.
  5. VALERII REZNIKOV
    #13 VALERII REZNIKOV Guests
    What is this category of "digital devices"? The rest of the film or what?
  6. Arthur
    #12 Arthur Guests
    stupid rating, where are the mirrorless?
  7. Vitaliy
    #11 Vitaliy Guests
    I am a professional photographer with great experience and I dare to notice. Smartphones will kill mass-market cameras, only professional-line cameras for making money or other work will remain. A breakthrough in computational photography made by Google and picked up by other companies will kill the photo market. The quality will be comparable or better, only a smartphone is lighter, more compact, and always with you. It's like a debate about whether vinyl disks will kill.
  8. Darya
    #10 Darya Guests
    Recently I got myself a Canon PowerShot SX70 HS for work, as I am a novice photographer, of course, I was attracted by the price. Value for money pleased, even in the courses for photographers, the teacher noted that this is a fairly "good budget model."
  9. Mick
    #9 Mick Guests
    Who wrote this article?
    Cons D780 - Not a New Model? =) This is generally the best camera according to the authoritative version of TIPA 2020. This is the latest camera from the entire list.
    D850 in the aggregate TTX from the entire list should stand in 1 place.
  10. Alexander Chernov
    #8 Alexander Chernov Guests
    I don’t understand that, so below, they ganged up on the fact of the incorrect distribution of the rating, which is better, which is more expensive. I myself use only "Canon", I have three SLRs, a bunch of lenses. I agree, those people who are very well versed in this - they are given such a rating as a red rag for the bull, but so "undermined" because of this. Horror) But the aforementioned "Canon EOS 90D" is just one of those devices that I aimed at in the near future. This is a thing!
  11. Olga
    #7 Olga Guests
    Thank you for the article. For a long time I want to change my old Nikon d90 to something more worthy, but I just can not decide. The choice is between SLRs and mirrorless cameras. Nevertheless, it seems to me that the future lies with the latter. I consider options from Sony and Fujifilm
  12. Elena
    #6 Elena Guests
    If I needed to choose a camera now, I would stop at the Canon PowerShot SX620 HS. A famous brand, it costs relatively little money and quality photos.
  13. Mikhalych
    #5 Mikhalych Guests
    and Nikon Coolpix P1000 is not quoted with Nikon Coolpix P900?
    Who can say something?
  14. admin
    #4 admin Administrators
    Are there those who can collect the rating better? No problem, I'm waiting for data from a professional who will collect better! Of course not for free!
    We do not mind correcting mistakes and improving the top, but give me the data of a pro who will collect the rating better. It is the cameras, for the third year in a row, only the lazy one doesn’t kick, everyone can cheat, ok - let's do better! Waiting for the data of a knowledgeable person
    1. Denis
      #3 Denis Guests
      To begin with, the question is: what rating and who should you collect, you?

      About the "review" of the "best cameras of 2020" of the year: I won’t even take into account grammatical errors - take the dictionaries, Russian textbooks and go ahead, edit it yourself.
      On the "set" of "best" cameras: all in one pile and completely stupid. To start with the fact that everything (from the word "completely") is a modern digital camera.
      Have you heard of Phase One or Hasselblad? Very good cameras. Maybe even the best.
      About the terminological nonsense that you write it’s even funny to say:
      1) "studio SLR camera with support for full-frame DSLR technology ..." - in what place is it "studio" and what is this "full-frame DSLR technology"?
      2) "This is an advanced SLR camera with a Canon EF / EF-S mount ..." - who moved it and where, and how did the EF mount become designated by the EF-S lens markings?
      3) "Together with the aperture F2.8, an elegant result is achieved" - what kind of pearl? What about the "archival" mirrorless model in the "SLR cameras" section.
      4) "The best SLR camera of 2020 - the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II body model with advanced performance" - what kind of "advanced performance" is there, it produces something in huge volumes or the "advanced" for threshing chilly from each laying hen ? And the third version of the 1DX "brick" has already been released, if we are talking about cameras in 2020.
      5) "It's hard to find a more suitable digital camera for wildlife photography than the Nikon Coolpix P900." - C'mon, are you serious? I can name a bunch of models from Pentax, Olympus, Panasonic, Sigma, Canon and Nikon, which are much more suitable for shooting wildlife. This is not counting Leica and Phase One.
      6) "we recommend paying attention to the DxOMark service - one of the most authoritative resources involved in testing cameras" - has long been no longer an authority. There are much more authoritative resources that are testing live photographic equipment, and not clogging the brain of a naive consumer with abstract figures.
      7) "And this despite the fact that they are not suitable when working with point sources of light in the frame." it's about CCD matrices. Where did such brilliantly categorical conclusions come from? Do you yourself understand what you are writing about?

      Maybe first you need to read some book on the basics of photography, to begin to understand the terminology, types of cameras, and so on, and then take up reviews / selections / ratings?
      If you need help, "Of course not for free!" (quote), on editing / checking the material and correct / competent filling with normal information - please contact than I can, as they say.
      1. admin
        #2 admin Administrators
        We have 150+ ratings on various topics on our site, we build on reviews and reviews on large portals, can you read books on all existing electronics and household appliances? Everyone can be clever, there are no questions, if we had a profile site for photography and we adjusted it that way, there are no questions.
        It’s easy for adequate people to understand, you can’t fumble in all topics, photography is one of the most difficult tops, give me the contacts of a person who will adequately help improve the rating - we will contact him and improve the information!
    2. Nedd
      #1 Nedd Guests
      First you need to develop an assessment methodology that is better public.

      You also have a problem with the categories. The camera is a tool for solving problems within the budget.
      How can I compare the capabilities of the camera at x6 times the price difference? This is only possible if you call the Best camera in terms of price and quality, but then the order of the cameras will clearly change.

      Well, they will be hitting anyway. ;)
  15. Larry
    #0 Larry Guests
    I would also say a rating of OT amateurs. The article is not about anything. Pentax is not presented at all. Ay author! Are you up to what you are writing about?
  16. Officer
    #-1 Officer Guests
    The rating is for amateurs, but amateurs do not need it at all.
    1. VLAD
      #-2 VLAD Guests
      This is not a rating, empty.
    2. Vladislav
      #-3 Vladislav Guests
      I would say the rating is OT amateur. The article is not about anything.
  17. Sergey Shiryaev
    #-4 Sergey Shiryaev Guests
    And where are the mirrorless?

Tools

Smartphones

Reviews